0 Hell!02br 02br 00 What is wrong with this sentence?02br 00.................................02br 00he left his sister to cry.02br 00...............................02br 00A grammar book says that the above should be changed to02br 02br 00He left his siter crying.02br 02br 00But, i think both are right. What is right?02br 00Thank you. 0-
Top answer
0 They are both right. )00 0-
— Grammarwannabe
0 They are both right.
)00 0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 They are both right. The meanings are different02br 02br 00He left his sister crying--00His sister was crying and he just walked away and let her continue crying02br 02br 00He left his sister to cry--00He was with his sister and he left her so that he could cry (he didn't want her to see??)00 0-
0Hi,02br 00First, let's look at an easier example. Both of these are OK, but with different meanings.02br 02br 01b00He left his sister to cook dinner.02b00 She had to cook dinner, but she hadn't started when he left her.02br 01b00He left his sister cooking dinner. 02b00She had started cooking dinner when he left.0
0 01i00 He left his sister to cook dinner 02i00can also mean that he left his sister so that 01b00he02b00 could go and cook dinner02br 02br 00Is there a way to remove the ambiguity? 0-
1i00He left his sister so 01b00she02b00 01b00may/might02b00 cook dinner02i02br 01i00He left his sister so 01b00he02b00 01b00may/might02b00 cook dinner02i0-
0 Hi again,02br 01i00He left his sister to cook dinner 02i00can also mean that he left his sister so that 01b00he02b00 could go and cook dinner02br 02br 00Is there a way to remove the ambiguity?02br 02br 00If I intended that meaning but I didn't want to change the words, I'd put a comma after 'sister',