Lead to (noun)

Question

I think both of the following are correct. However, the text book says the first one is wrong.
(1) This led to many of the dishes cooked in a wrong order.

or
(2) This led to many of the dishes being cooked in a wrong order.

Usenet · Accepted Answer

While it was 23/1/04 6:11 pm throughout the UK, TOY sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell thus:
[nq:1]I think both of the following are correct. However, the text book says the first one is wrong. (1) This led to many of the dishes cooked in a wrong order.[/nq]
If that means anything, it's "This led to many of the dishes, which were cooked in a wrong order".
[nq:1]or (2) This led to many of the dishes being cooked in a wrong order.[/nq]
This means that, as a consequence of this, the dishes were cooked in a wrong order.
Which is the consequence: the dishes, or their being cooked? That determines which is the "correct" sentence.
Stewart.

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]I think both of the following are correct. However, the text book says the first one is wrong. (1) This ... cooked in a wrong order. or (2) This led to many of the dishes being cooked in a wrong order.[/nq]
Case 2 is idiomatic English (case 1 is unidiomatic) but case 2 has another error. English speakers say very nearly always "in the wrong order" not "in a wrong order."
(This idiom is downright paradoxical. We may
mean a series has only one right order but never
that it has only one wrong order. Nevertheless
English speakers usually say "the wrong order.")

Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]but case 2 has another error. English speakers say very nearly always "in the wrong order" not "in a wrong ... one right order but never that it has only one wrong order. Nevertheless English speakers usually say "the wrong order.")[/nq]
It is not implying there is only one wrong order. It is merely saying the order was wrong.
Which order? The order in which the dishes were cooked. What is it saying about that order? That it was wrong. So the order was wrong. It was the wrong order.

Alec McKenzie

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]I think both of the following are correct. However, the text book says the first one is wrong. (1) This ... cooked in a wrong order. or (2) This led to many of the dishes being cooked in a wrong order.[/nq]
The text book is right.

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]I think both of the following are correct. However, the ... many of the dishes being cooked in a wrong order.[/nq]
[nq:1]The text book is right.[/nq]
So, I'd wager, is the textbook.
Version (2) is reasonably idiomatic, but it has a fused participle that would make Fowler and many an American wince. I'll bet, even with no context, that "As a result, many of the dishes were cooked in the wrong order" is equally factual, and it sounds a lot better.

Bob Lieblich
Fussbudget manque

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]but case 2 has another error. English speakers say very ... wrong order. Nevertheless English speakers usually say "the wrong order.")[/nq]
[nq:1]It is not implying there is only one wrong order. It is merely saying the order was wrong.[/nq]
Not quite.
The definite article in English commonly implies
uniqueness (at least in the immediate context).
"I saw the dog" indicates one unique dog.
The indefinite article differs: "I saw a dog"
indicates any of several dogs.
Where right and wrong orders may exist, we
commonly assume the right order is unique
(there is only one right sequence) although
there may be various wrong orders. The logic
of consistency would therefore suggest that
we say usually "the right order" because it
is a unique sequence and "a wrong order" to
indicate one of several possible sequences.
(But English is not governed by the logic of
consistency.)
Apologies if I was unclear earlier.

Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]It is not implying there is only one wrong order. It is merely saying the order was wrong.[/nq]
[nq:1]Not quite. The definite article in English commonly implies uniqueness (at least in the immediate context). "I saw the dog" indicates one unique dog. The indefinite article differs: "I saw a dog" indicates any of several dogs.[/nq]
Not quite. The definite article guarantees the the hearer can uniquely identify the intended meaning, either because it is fully specified (as you indicate) or because he has the world view of a normal speaker of English (the way it is often also used). So it does not guarantee that the uniqueness has been fully spelled out in words.

Gary

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]I think both of the following are correct. However, the text book says the first one is wrong. (1) This ... cooked in a wrong order. or (2) This led to many of the dishes being cooked in a wrong order.[/nq]
Only (2) is English, as others have told you.
Think of it like this. "Lead to" is not being used as an exotic idiom here, but as an ordinary verb followed by a prepositional phrase, just as in:
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink".

So you need to have a noun or noun-equivalent as the object of the preposition (something corresponding to "water" in my example). The ing- form ("gerund") "being cooked" is capable of serving as a noun- substitute, the participle "cooked" isn't.
If you want to confuse your teacher totally, you could even claim that there should be an apostrophe after the word "dishes", since the subject of a gerund is supposed to be a possessive form, so that the sentence should read:
This led to many of the dishes' being cooked in a wrong order.

Gary

Usenet · Answer

But does (1) imply this one :
This led to many of the dishes (being) cooked in a wrong order.

Since the dishes must be cooked, "being" should be understood by the audience.
"Gary Vellenzer" (Email Removed)
??:

Lead to (noun)

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions