hhtt I cannot understand what "law against the wearing bikinis" refers to? I can't either. It's not correct.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
hhttI cannot understand what "law against the wearing bikinis" refers to?I can't either. It's not correct.
hhttthe law against the wearing of bikinis.As shown.
hhttDoes itrefer tomean "wearing bikinisareis completelybecomeforbidden" ...
CalifJim hhttthe law against the wearing of bikinis.As shown.hhttDoes it refer to mean "wearing bikinis are is completely become forbidden" ... ?Yes. Presumably if you are seen wearing a bikini, you must take it off immediately (and pay a fine). CJWhy does refer was incorrect in "does it refer to wearing ..." ?
hhttWhy does refer was incorrect in "does it refer to wearing ..." ?'Refer' is simply the wrong word choice. That is why other of your posts have been confusing. 'Refer' points to information outside the given context, and you never give the wider context in your posts.
CliveThe usual verb is 'repeal a law', not 'annul'.repeal means Parliament does not want the law anymore.annul implies that the law was eg not written correctly. Usually, this is decided by the Courts, not by Parliament.Then nullify would not fit for repeal for this context again. There is a slight difference, isn't it?
CliveIn a legal context, 'annul' is used more often than 'nullify'.Repeal is the American English verb to use.