0
Anonymous Posted 14 years ago
Grammar
lapse
Is a lapse the word I should use?
What do you think of the sentence altogether?
I've won more in four year than you have in the same lapse.
You 've won less in four year than I have in the same lapse.
What do you think of the sentence altogether?
I've won more in four year than you have in the same lapse.
You 've won less in four year than I have in the same lapse.
Top answer
Lapse doesn't really work here. This will do fine: I've won more in four year s than you (have). ), then you need the word times.
- Lapse doesn't really work here.
- This will do fine: I've won more in four year s than you (have).
- ), then you need the word times.
- I've won more times in four year s than you (have) .
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Lapse doesn't really work here.
This will do fine:
I've won more in four years than you (have).
If you mean you've won on more occasions (rather than won more prizes, trophies, etc.), then you need the word times.
I've won more times in four years than you (have).
This will do fine:
I've won more in four years than you (have).
If you mean you've won on more occasions (rather than won more prizes, trophies, etc.), then you need the word times.
I've won more times in four years than you (have).
0
Related Questions