1. I know a teacher that biked back and forth to school in grade 7. (With 'grade 7' in here, do I need to shift 'know' to 'knew' ?)
2. I knew a teacher that biked back and forth to school in grade 7.
3. In grade 7, I knew a teacher that biked back and forth to school.
4. In grade 7, I know a teacher that biked back and forth to school. (Even thought I know this teacher, I'm talking about the past so I need to use 'knew' right?)
Thanks
Top answer
3. (When I was) In grade 7, I knew a teacher that biked back and forth to school. I think this is the only correct one.
— Marius Hancu
3.
(When I was) In grade 7, I knew a teacher that biked back and forth to school.
I think this is the only correct one.
).
4 is confusing.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It's better to use "who" for people - when the relative pronoun is a subject - isn't it? "That" is OK for people when it's a complement, and then you can drop it. (I'm talking about defining relative clauses)
Ugh. I always get in trouble when people start using terms like "defining relative clause" because I'm not very good at the proper names of things.
Do you mean things like "My daughter, who is in first grade, is very cute" versus "My daughter that is in first grade is very cute" to differentiate her my other daughter (who, uh, must look like a troll)?
With me, the "who/that" for people thing is probably one of those "rules" that you never should have learned, because they're wrong sometimes. I just try NOT to use "that" for people if "who" works just as well.
You are probably correct that when you need to use a restrictive clause (in this case to tell my first-grade daughter from my third-grade daughter), that "that" is a better choic