May contain SPOILERS [nq:1]From UK Daily Mail[/nq] This gorilla of a film is blockbuster of the year by BAZ BAMIGBOYE, Daily Mail 09:45am 2nd December 2005 Just over a year ago, Oscar-winning film-maker Peter Jackson stood on the mammoth Skull Island set he had built on a peninsula in New Zealand and told me why he loved King Kong. ³The original Kong is a wonderful blend - probably the most perfect blend - of escapism and adventure, mystery and romance. It does everything an escapist movie should do: it takes you places you are never going to see and gives you experiences you are never going to have.²
Jackson¹s words came back to me as I sat in the back row at the Loews Cinema complex on New York¹s West 68th Street this week, watching the first screening of his new version of Kong. He may not have known it at the time, but Jackson could just as well have been talking about his own extraordinary remake of the movie that inspired him to become a director when he saw it one Friday night on TV when he was just nine years old. The very next morning, Jackson started creating stop-motion films using Plasticine. This time round, the director had some much bigger toys - 21st-century humdingers - to play with. And he has made a picture I can only describe as jaw-droppingly brilliant: the most entertaining blockbuster movie this year.
But all this monkey business wouldn¹t amount to a hill of beans if the movie didn¹t have a heart, and boy, does it. Kong¹s the last of his race. He has withdrawn into himself, and the occasional sacrificial native (he plays with them for a while and then tosses them away like chicken wings) is merely a distraction from the pain of his lonely life. Then along comes beauty, in the shape of Ann Darrow, a Depression-era vaudeville performer living on the breadline, who lands a role in a madcap director¹s fantasy feature. Ann, as played by Naomi Watts, is pretty weary herself. And somehow, the great ape and the lovely, lost woman recognise they are kindred spirits under the skin. Or, in his case, fur. There¹s a beautiful moment with Kong sitting on top of a mountain, Ann in the palm of his hand, both watching the sunset. I actually heard one tough broad of a movie executive sobbing. Jackson evokes such a sense of empathy for his beast that Kleenex should be sold along with the popcorn.
King Kong truly is an 8,000lb gorilla of a movie. I¹m still marvelling at a scene where a herd of brachiosaurus stampede as they are pursued by predators with teeth the size of carving knives. Then, just when you think such a sequence can¹t be topped, Kong pounds to rescue his damsel in distress when some hungry velociraptors mistake her for a snack. An almighty battle ensues and it¹s at this point Kong goes from super monster to super hero in Ann¹s eyes. Jack Black, who plays preening, self-promoting movie maker Carl Denham, told me that, in the original movie, his character was older and more of a ³kick-ass action hero.² ²This Denham is darker,² he says. ²He has an obsession with accomplishment. He¹s got insecurities and has this fear of not accomplishing something great before he dies.
²Fran Walsh (Jackson¹s life partner) told me my Denham has to have a little bit of Willy Loman from Death Of A Salesman to him. There¹s fear and arousal on my part. Certainly that¹s what Denham is feeling when he captures Kong on Skull Island.² Jack tells me all children - ³at least all boys² - love King Kong.
²He is the king of all the monsters, even better than Godzilla. Kong is stronger and smarter than Godzilla, who¹s just a stupid, slimy lizard.²
He was referring to the original Kong and the gormless 1976 remake with Jessica Lange. But I think Jackson¹s version, which he wrote with Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens (the trio also adapted The Lord Of The Rings for the screen), is accessible to all. I don¹t know what the rating in the UK will be for the film - which also features Jamie Bell, Adrien Brody, Thomas Kretschmann, Kyle Chandler and Colin Hanks - when it opens in the UK on December 15. (It will have its London gala next Thursday, December 8.) But it might be a bit much for tiny tots. As I write this, I¹m getting shivers thinking of the moment when Andy Serkis - who plays a double role, but more of that later, as they say - encounters a giant insect that extends itself horribly and slurps him down head first. It terrified me, but then I¹m the guy who, years ago, ran from a Manhattan apartment I¹d rented because there were cockroaches in the oven. Forget roaches - the bugs in this movie are the size of Agas.
Serkis was at the screening, along with most of the cast. The Londonbased actor told me the final version had only been wrapped up this Monday. Andy¹s two roles are that of ship¹s cook (his speciality is porridge al la walnuts) - and Kong. He went to Rwanda for a few weeks to study the gorillas - in particular, to observe how they moved and communicated with each other.
Jackson had Andy act out Kong¹s role and then digitalised it, using the same technique employed with Gollum in the Lord Of The Rings films. Richard Taylor, Jackson¹s long-time technical collaborator, explained: ³Today, as an audience, we crave an emotional relationship, so we used Andy to drive Kong. To make him convey the toughness of this giant silverback, but also to give a sense of empathy. ²In Lord Of The Rings, we used an orange ball to denote something the actors would be acting to, and we added the special effects later. Here, we used Andy or a series of sculptures of Kong¹s face.²
The Kong busts took a long time to make. Just punching in the 40,000 yak hairs took three-andahalf weeks for each one. Monday will be the world premiere of King Kong, with cinemas around New York¹s Times Square showing the movie. Some critics will carp about its length - three hours - but for me, the time sped by. Jackson opens his movie with Al Jolson singing I¹m Sitting On Top Of The World. And that¹s where the director is - with the competition far, far below.
A good story cannot be devised; it has to be distilled. Raymond Chandler
Top answer
I'm greatly looking forward to this, but I can't put totally out of my mind the nagging thought that I always have a problem with CGI characters. This is nothing to do with how well they're done (and Kong and chums are clearly very well done indeed) - I just can't get away from the fact that I know they're not real, not physical presences. They don't have to be living physical presences.
— Usenet
I'm greatly looking forward to this, but I can't put totally out of my mind the nagging thought that I always have a problem with CGI characters.
This is nothing to do with how well they're done (and Kong and chums are clearly very well done indeed) - I just can't get away from the fact that I know they're not real, not physical presences.
They don't have to be living physical presences.
I believed completely in Yoda when he was a puppet and actually on set with the actors, but (quite apart from the awful scripts) never afterwards.
The CGI expressions in the ET Special Edition took me right out of the truth of the movie.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I'm greatly looking forward to this, but I can't put totally out of my mind the nagging thought that I always have a problem with CGI characters. This is nothing to do with how well they're done (and Kong and chums are clearly very well done indeed) - I just can't get away from the fact that I know they're not real, not physical presences. They don't have to be living physical pr
[nq:1]I'm greatly looking forward to this, but I can't put totally out of my mind the nagging thought that I always have a problem with CGI characters.[/nq] Well, Jackson is using far less CGI in this movie than you'd expect (for creatures, at least - there's a shot of a ship in the trailer that is just hideously horrid CGI - but I'm trying to be optimistic because CGI stuff is always being wo
[nq:1]Well, Jackson is using far less CGI in this movie than you'd expect...[/nq] Er... Have I misunderstood the publicity then? Kong himself is a CGI creation, surely? [nq:1]...where the effects guy is doing stop-motion work with a miniature Kong.[/nq] This is the first time I've heard of any stop-motion work being in the film at all. Bert www.bertcoules.co.uk
[nq:1]Er... Have I misunderstood the publicity then? Kong himself is a CGI creation, surely?[/nq] [nq:2]...where the effects guy is doing stop-motion work with a miniature Kong.[/nq] [nq:1]This is the first time I've heard of any stop-motion work being in the film at all.[/nq] I believe that Kong is a mixture of animatronics, stop-motion (or, more likely "go-motion" - the hi-tech versi
[nq:1]I'm greatly looking forward to this, but I can't put totally out of my mind the nagging thought that I ... done indeed) - I just can't get away from the fact that I know they're not real, not physical presences.[/nq] The idea of a new "King Kong" movie never impressed me much. But when I learned that Peter Jackson was going to do it (and that he has wanted to film it for a long ti