Hi all,
These are the first two paragraphs of my oral presentation. In the opening paragraph, my aim is to show the audience that the issue is controversial and recent. In the second paragraph, I wanted to identify what the issue is and describe the main characteristics of the issue from the viewpoints of the community, victims and defendants. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.

Since its first use in New South Wales almost two hundred years ago, the jury system has long been a much debated aspect of the criminal justice system. With the latest reform being in November this year, the jury system has once again sparked discussions of its value in achieving justice amid competing interests within the community.
The issue at hand is really whether the jury system in our criminal justice framework serves the purpose of delivering justice effectively and efficiently. This issue of the jury system has attracted many conflicting opinions from the community, the victims and the defendants. The cost of running the jury system amounted to over nine million dollars last year. The general public is most concerned by these annual expenses, as confirmed by the Institute of Criminology. Among those working within the criminal justice system, most agree the jury is able to deliver justice, although some, like crown prosecutor Christopher Maxell, believe that ‘justice would not suffer by abolishing juries and having judge-alone trials’. Yet the notion that the defendant should be tried by his or her peers remains central to the rights of the defendant. On the other hand, victims of crime assistance league has stressed the trauma that victims endure in prolonged jury trials especially in assault and sexual assault cases where victims testimonies constitute much of the evidence presented.
Thank you
PBF