Johnson13 is there a difference between these two and the above two? Yes, but it may be easier to see the difference if you try two things: 1) Paraphrase each sentence as I show below. 2) Consider the difference between verbs that show continuous actions and verbs that show instantaneous action.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Johnson13is there a difference between these two and the above two?Yes, but it may be easier to see the difference if you try two things: 1) Paraphrase each sentence as I show below. 2) Consider the difference between verbs that show continuous actions and verbs that show instantaneous action.
Johnson13But can we say She's arrived since 7 o'clock?No. That is very strange indeed. She arrived after 7 o'clock. She has been here since 7 o'clock.
Johnson13Isn't BECOME the same type of verb as ARRIVE? When we say a prince becomes a frog, it is impossible to continue the act of becoming nonstop, right?Yes, I believe you have a point there.
Johnson13XYZ law (it should be gun control or something similar) has not been passed since1994.As it stands it's not natural. It would be fine as 'A gun control law has not been passed'.
fivejedjon Johnson13XYZ law (it should be gun control or something similar) has not been passed since1994.As it stands it's not natural. It would be fine as 'A gun control law has not been passed'.Thanks.
Johnson13XYZ law (it should be gun control or something similar) has not been passed since1994.Do you think it's natural or was it a slip of the tongue?I think we may be getting somewhere with this example, but I warn you that it may be a false lead, and we still may have to abandon this line of thought and go back to the drawing board.
Johnson13He has died since then.This one has a definite subject but no negation. The lack of negation probably changes how we judge whether the pattern is grammatical or not.