Hello.
Is the sentence below correct?
It is said that the breakaway faction are a group of radical religious fundamentalists.
Especially, can we treat 'faction' as either plural or singular similiarly like, for example, 'team'?
Reegis Is the sentence below correct? Because both 'faction' and 'group' are singular, 'are' is grammatically discordant; it should be 'is'. What has come into play for the writer is notional concord.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
ReegisIs the sentence below correct?
Because both 'faction' and 'group' are singular, 'are' is grammatically discordant; it should be 'is'. What has come into play for the writer is notional concord.
Reegiscan we treat 'faction' as either plural or singular similiarly like, for example, 'team'?
No, we cannot, but
Thanks Mister Micawber!
Mister Micawberuncertainty reigns with this kind of sentence
Could you please explain what you meant here?
I understand that 'faction' is still singular, but 'fundamentalists' are of course plural, so no matter what form of the verb (is/are) we use there will be no concord...
ReegisI understand that 'faction' is still singular, but 'fundamentalists' are of course plural, so no matter what form of the verb (is/are) we use there will be no concord
There you are: that is the uncertainty!
So what should people do? Avoid such structures? Or pick either 'is' or 'are' and under these cirsumstances both are OK?
ReegisSo what should people do? Avoid such structures?
Recasting is the wisest course.
ReegisOr pick either 'is' or 'are' and under these cirsumstances both are OK?
You will see both, and without protest raised. Strict grammar says that the verb must agree with the subject not the complement.