sb70012 Do you agree that both are correct? Yes. However, gerund-participials much more commonly occur in subject rather than extraposed subject position ( Having a picnic on a rainy day is foolish ).
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
sb70012Do you agree that both are correct?Yes. However, gerund-participials much more commonly occur in subject rather than extraposed subject position (Having a picnic on a rainy day is foolish). With to-infinitivals it’s the other way around. That’s probably why according to the answer key only to have is correct.
Aspara Gus (Having a picnic on a rainy day is foolish).I agree with the sb70012, Both versions are correct, but the 2nd version is only more appropriate within a specific context:
Anonymous the 2nd version is only more appropriate within a specific context:It's been raining on and off all week. Mary wants to have a picnic outing. The morning looks cloudy and John looked reluctant to go,and said " It is foolish having a picnic on a rainy day!"I don’t see that, GF.
Aspara GusI don’t see that, GF.Hello,
sb70012 Aspara GusI don’t see that, GF.Hello,May I know what you mean by this?Thank you.Aspara Gus does not think that GF (the anonymous poster) is correct in what h write. I agree with Aspara Gus.
sb70012I searched for [it's foolish + gerund] but I even couldn't find one example.But I found hundreds of examples for [it's foolish + to-infinitive]As I said, to-infinitivals are much more usual in this function. But you hear gerund-participials occasionally: the COCA has over 100 citations for It was/is + adjective + extraposed gerund-partici
Aspara Gus the COCA has over 100 citations for It was/is + adjective + extraposed gerund-participial.Thank you.
sb70012May I have the link please? I really like to see those examples.Here you are:
Aspara Gus Enter these strings in the search box:it is [j] [v?g*]it was [j] [v?g*]Thanks a million. Now I'm looking at the examples.