It is about the position of "to"
Hello everyone,
I am curious where the position of "to" should be.
Which ones do you think are correct?
1-)
To learn the exact schedule, I have to contact lecturers giving courses which don't have any schedule.
2-)
I have to contact lecturers to learn the exact schedule giving courses which don't have any schedule.
3-)
I have to contact lecturers giving courses which don't have any schedule to learn the exact schedule?
I think,
2 is wrong becuase "to learn the exact schedule" and "lecturers" don't have any common connection. So, their being together seems not to make sense to me.
3 is a little bit ambiguous.
1 is OK, I think.
What do you all think? Thanks.
Top answer
(2) makes the least sense, but the others are also confusing. When you talk about "courses which don't have any schedule", do you mean that their schedules have been omitted from the timetable, or something like that? In other words, they have been scheduled, but you just don't currently know what the schedules are?
- (2) makes the least sense, but the others are also confusing.
- When you talk about "courses which don't have any schedule", do you mean that their schedules have been omitted from the timetable, or something like that?
- In other words, they have been scheduled, but you just don't currently know what the schedules are?
- Because, if they haven't been scheduled at all, then how can you learn the "exact schedule" by asking about them?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
(2) makes the least sense, but the others are also confusing. When you talk about "courses which don't have any schedule", do you mean that their schedules have been omitted from the timetable, or something like that? In other words, they have been scheduled, but you just don't currently know what the schedules are? Because, if they haven't been scheduled at all, then how can you learn the "ex
0
Related Questions