Hi. Could you check whether the following examples are grammatically correct and meaningful? They are with "X and Y," as the details are not of the primary importance.
As a result, in X's works, it came to the denial of Y's very existence.
All this ended up with the situation when Y was declared non-existent in X's works.
It came to the point that Y was declared non-existent in X's works.
What is better to use in such a context, it comes to or end up with?
Thanks.
What sort of "works" are we talking about? Are they writings? anonymous As a result, in X's works, it came to the denial of Y's very existence.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
What sort of "works" are we talking about? Are they writings?
anonymousAs a result, in X's works, it came to the denial of Y's very existence.
This does not read properly.
anonymousAll this ended up with the situation when Y was declared non-existent in X's works.
"when" should be "where", but the sentence is