Our friends in the British media are nothing if not keen on multi-culti empathy and showing ?respect' for alien modes.
As far as the Hispanic world is concerned, there was the spasmodic pronunciation of the UN Secretary-General Perez de Cuellar's name as ?Pereth' (the guy was Peruvian, where ?z' is pronounced ?s'); but the lisp really got going with the 1992 Olympics at Barcelona. (Though I seem to remember that, whilst BBC newsreaders would lisp, though most through gritted teeth, the sports department by and large persisted with the English pronunciation of the name.)
Lisping now seems rather to have gone out of fashion at the Beeb. But, in today's ?Observer', another example of going too far to ape the Hispanic. A report from Venezuela (1) by one Reed Lindsay (presumably an English mother-tongue speaker) talks about
??the so-called Bolívarian Circles, government-promoted neighbour hood organisations that mainly serve as political action groups in support of the President?'
That's ?Bolivarian', not Bolivian. The reference is to Simon Bolivar, the Liberator (2). Or, in Spanish, Simón Bolívar, El Libertador.
Note the accents: the rule is that Spanish words ending in a consonant are stressed on the last syllable, unless that consonant is either an ?s' or an ?n'. Exceptions to the rule bear an accent on the vowel to be stressed.
But the guy is writing in English. Just as there is no crying in baseball, there are no accents in English! A word gets its naturalisation papers, it has to kick its accents, that's the deal. Otherwise, it's a resident alien, with inverted commas. (I'm not so sure about ?café', which is as British as they come now, but still seems wrong without the accent.)
In a word like ?Bolivarian', there can surely be no place for an accent. Can there?
Not that it affects the issue; but ?bolivariano' doesn't have an accent in Spanish either! The stress is on the penultimate syllable - regular for words ending in a vowel.
As some were with Perez de Cuellar, the (to judge from the piece) rather right-on, ?engagé' Mr Lindsay is more Catholic than the Pope on Bolivarianism.
(I'm distinctly hazy on the underlying concept, beyond the fact it's the ideology (or fig-leaf, if you will) covering President Hugo Chavez's political operations. And a not-so-subtle hint that Chavez is the Bolivar of the millennium. But for a flavour of the fervour: (3).)
Lindsay has ?Chávez', of course. Look forward to his next report from Firenze, Köln
(1)
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1015675,00.html (2)
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/7609/eng/bio.html (3)
http://www.marxist.com/Latinam/venezuela revolution at crossroads.html