It's quite possible that you're repeatedly misinterpretting a reduction of the word has . However, people might jocularly use 'is' that way on rare occasions, possibly as a way of intentionally making the sentence sound archaic. You can also find that sort of usage in English written in the 1600s, for example.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AstonishingWhat about this sentence:That sounds very odd. You're quite sure that's what was being said?
'Where is he gone?'
I've seen people use this plenty of times. Shouldn't it be has instead of is?
Marius Hancu"The time is come."'Right you are, Marius. In German sein, the German equivalent of be, is still used as a parfect and pluperfect auxiliary with certain verbs. Except for some exceptional cases, have is used in English and har in Swedish and the other Sca
This is old/historical usage.