0
Anonymous Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Is WITH optional?

0Both single- and double-strand breaks of the DNA helix can be induced, 01b01u00with02u02b00 the latter constituting lethal damage. 02br
02br
02br
02br
02br
02br
00Could we leave out "01i01b00with02b02i00"? Why?02br
02br
01i00who 02i00with 01i00who02i00 in the sentence?02br
02br
02br
02br
00a lot of thanks!0-
  

Top answer

0-

  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
0If a double-strand part breaks off the DNA, it will lead to death.0-
0
0 I think you need it. 02br
02br
00 Search Google with02br
01b00"with the latter * having"02b02br
05002br
02br
01h2

01a00Photochemistry and Photophysics of Thienocarbazoles<

0
0 IMO, here:02br
02br
01i00 with=02i01b01i00and02i02br
02br
02b
00thus in your context: 01b02br
02b
02br
01i00 ....,01b00 and02b00 the latter constitutes lethal damage02i0-
0
0 01blockquote
00Could we leave out "11i11b10with12b12i10"?12blockquote
10Yes.02br
01blockquote
00Why?12blockquote
10I don't think there's a good answer why. It's just that it's OK without "with".02br
02br
00 CJ0-

Related Questions