0
Stenka25 Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

IS vs. WERE

The site below has this sentence as follows, “If Canton is destroyed, the nation might fall.”
http://webfs1.kice.re.kr/sunung/2013_9/q3.pdf

Don’t you think the verb of If-clause seems to have a grammatical error?
Like the sentence below the verb “is” of the statement above should be changed to “were” or at least “was” since these days “was” can replace “were” in this kind of sentence except for a sterotyped phrase “if I were you.”

He also stated that if Iraq's chemical weapons were not destroyed, they might fall into the hands of terrorists, which would lead to an uncertain future.
http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/World-Leaders-2003/Uzbekistan-FOREIGN-POLICY.html#b

What do you think of my thought?
  

Top answer

Hi, Stenka25 Don’t you think the verb of If-clause seems to have a grammatical error? No, I think it's fine. It simply seems to me to be the first conditional.

  • Hi, Stenka25 Don’t you think the verb of If-clause seems to have a grammatical error?
  • No, I think it's fine.
  • It simply seems to me to be the first conditional.
  • Regars
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Hi,
Stenka25 Don’t you think the verb of If-clause seems to have a grammatical error?
No, I think it's fine. It simply seems to me to be the first conditional.

Regars

Related Questions