0
Guest Posted 22 years ago
Grammar

Is this sentence wrong?

HELP ME!

I'm in a class where my teacher believes she is "God." I have no problem with the authority she has over me but sometimes she contradicts herself. For instance, I read her a section of my paper and she said it was correct but when I recieved the paper back she marked it wrong. My teacher said that this sentence didn't make any sense." Traditional authority, rational legal authority, and charasmatic authority is to be believed as the three types of authority developed by Marx Weber." She marked the word "is" as a subject verb agreement. Can someone please tell me if I'm the one that is mistaken?
  

Top answer

it must be are instead of " is" cause the subject is plural.

  • it must be are instead of " is" cause the subject is plural.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
it must be are instead of " is" cause the subject is plural.
0
I'm not sure as to what she meant by 'not making sense', but I can answer the grammatical part.

Since they're three types of authorities, it would be incorrect to place 'is', unless they're meant to be seen as one ('eating and drinking' as food consumption, for example.).

'Is' would be used, too, in a sentence like "A, like B and C, IS bigger than D."

However, 'are'
0
GuestTraditional authority, rational legal legal-rational authority, and charasmatic charismatic authority is to be believed as are the three types of authority developed described

Related Questions