0
Anonymous Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Is this sentence punctuated correctly? Why or why not

The game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time.
  

Top answer

Hi, The game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time. It's fine. If you remove the comma, it suggests that Russians also created other games in 1934 when they were not thinking of ways to kill time.

  • Hi, The game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time.
  • It's fine.
  • If you remove the comma, it suggests that Russians also created other games in 1934 when they were not thinking of ways to kill time.
  • Clive
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
Hi,

The game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time.

It's fine.

If you remove the comma, it suggests that Russians also created other games in 1934 when they were not thinking of ways to kill time.
0
Clive
Hi,

The game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time.

It's fine.

If you remove the comma, it suggests that Russians also created other games in 1934 when they were not thinking of ways to kill time.
0
AnonymousThe game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time.
The sentence is fine as it is but it may be more common to leave out the comma, particularly since both the main clause and the subordinate clause are quite short. If you want the reader to pause and reflect upon what you have said before the subordinate clause (when t
0
Hi again,

The game was created in 1934, when the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time.

Consider these scenarios.

Let's say that in 1934, the Russians were thinking of ways to kill time in June, July and August. In the other months, they were not.

Scenario A. They created only one game in 1934, in July.

0
Intuitively, I tend to go with the version without the comma which seems to flow better.
0
GoodmanIntuitively, I tend to go with the version without the comma which seems to flow better.
That's the normal usage, Goodman. I have certainly never seen Clive's interpretation in a temporal clause in my lifetime.
CB
0
To me

, when = and at that time

when = at the time when
0
My perception is this:

Both contexts appear to have no obvious usage differences, which is a false impression. But they both are correct with out comma after [ when] in my opinion, although the usage is slightly different.



The period was the early 1950’s when most people never heard of the word transisto
0
My perception is this:

Both contexts appear to have no obvious usage differences, which is a false impression. But they both are correct with out comma after [ when] in my opinion, although the usage is slightly different.



The period was the early 1950’s when most people never heard of the word transisto
0
Good post, Clive.

However, I would have to ask that if you refer to it as 'the game', then wouldn't the reader already know which game is being talked about, in which case you should use a comma.

Related Questions