Is this sentence grammatical?
1.Who has talked with her does not know the tenderness of her heart?
2.Who that has talked with her does not know the tenderness of her heart?
I just came across the first sentence, but is that sentence really grammatical? Should there be "that" added behind "Who" as in sentence 2? I have never learnt that "who" can function like "what".
So I have looked "who" up in my dic, and found it says the usage of who like in the first case is archaic, but I'm not sure whether this dictionary is right coz it has a lot of errors according to native speakers and it was published by a Korean company.
Top answer
fire1 the usage of who like in the first case is archaic I don't think so. A quick rummage through the attic of my mind yields nothing. " Your Korean dictionary probably meant that use.
- fire1 the usage of who like in the first case is archaic I don't think so.
- A quick rummage through the attic of my mind yields nothing.
- " Your Korean dictionary probably meant that use.
- It is no longer possible, though.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fire1the usage of who like in the first case is archaic
I don't think so. A quick rummage through the attic of my mind yields nothing. The positive case, yes: "Who has talked with her knows the tenderness of her heart." Your Korean dictionary probably meant that use. It is no longer possible, though.
0
Related Questions