The sentence is correct, but it is a different meaning of "what". In the sentence about CEOs, "what" is a pronoun meaning "which things". In the sentence about China, "what" is a determiner that modifies "a terrible problem", intensifying or drawing attention to those words.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GPY"what" is a determiner that modifies "a terrible problem", intensifying or drawing attention to those words.So, do you mean "...well aware of what a terrible problem China is faced with." = "...well aware of a terrible problem China is faced with.", but the tone of the former one is stonger(the problem is more terrible)?
tonyscottSo, do you mean "...well aware of what a terrible problem China is faced with." = "...well aware of a terrible problem China is faced with.", but the tone of the former one is stonger(the problem is more terrible)?In concept roughly yes, but actually it is more complicated. If you remove "what" then it is natural to change to the definite article, an
tonyscottSo, is it "..well aware of what terrible problem.." or "..well aware of what a terrible problem.."?For the intended meaning it must be "what a terrible problem". "what terrible problem" doesn't flow naturally to me in that sentence, but it would mean "which terrible problem", i.e. there are several candidate terrible problems, and citizen