Most of this reads as if you are in support of tougher controls on driving licences for the elderly. The last sentence rather comes as a surprise. There are other problems too, but overall coherence should come first, I think.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GPYMost of this reads as if you are in support of tougher controls on driving licences for the elderly.Well, I'm required to stick to the topic I'm writing about which is stated in the following:"According to some people, elderly drivers should be required to reapply for their driving licences. How do you feel about it?"
GPYThe last s
kunsusukiI couldn't get why it has caused you much surprise? I clearly have to indicate which side I am with in this debate.Most of the statements up until the last seem to be explaining why old people's driving may be impaired, i.e. arguing in favour of these licence restrictions. Yet in the last sentence you say you are against the restriction
kunsusukiAh! It's a mistake. I wrote the word resent, but I meant the word assent.AHA!
kunsusukiHow about coherence, it seems that I have a problem with itMy comment about coherence related to the mixed message resulting from the assent/resent slip.
kunsusukiHow about the narrowing down of the topic is it appropriate?If you fix the slip in the last sentence then the overall flow seems OK to me. However, there are various other issues.