I wonder if anyone could tell me if this sounds good in an essay or not (especially the second sentence):
Note that the essay doubts that ‘literal’ and ‘non-literal’ meanings are existent and scholarly phenomena. Therefore, any mention of those terms in the essay is attributed to a scholar, researcher or publication (not to the dissertation or its author himself).
Thank you!
Pal
Top answer
That doesn't sound good. It's better not to address the reader directly (ie Note that . .
— Clive
That doesn't sound good.
It's better not to address the reader directly (ie Note that .
.
) I don't now what you mean by ‘ literal’ and ‘non-literal’ meanings and by existent and scholarly phenomena.
If you doub t something, it means you have an opinion but not sure about it.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
How can I express, in an elegant way, that if I mention the words 'literal'/'non-literal' in the essay ... they are not my words (because I do not believe that such phenomena exist) but somebody else' ...
Okay, ... all I want to say is that although I do not believe that literal or non-literal meanings exist, I will use the terms in the essay because other scholars do refer to them in their works. However, each and every time I will give the references to those publications. This is what I want to word in a more formal way.