0
Guest Posted 21 years ago
Grammar
Is this correct grammer?
"...generating repeatable, sustainable Alpha in the emerging markets." the use of both "...repeatable, sustainable..." seems incorrcet but I certainly do not know the rules why? It sounds bad but is there a rule why it is bad?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Top answer
I wouldn't use both. You are not really breaking a rule it just sounds a bit pointless. Repeatable - to do more than once Sustainable - to be able to keep on doing?
- I wouldn't use both.
- You are not really breaking a rule it just sounds a bit pointless.
- Repeatable - to do more than once Sustainable - to be able to keep on doing?
- So it is the doubling of information that sounds odd.
- However, I can't really follow the phrase properly without knowing what Alpha is.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
I wouldn't use both. You are not really breaking a rule it just sounds a bit pointless.
Repeatable - to do more than once
Sustainable - to be able to keep on doing?
So it is the doubling of information that sounds odd.
However, I can't really follow the phrase properly without knowing what Alpha is. I imagine there could be some things which could be desc
Repeatable - to do more than once
Sustainable - to be able to keep on doing?
So it is the doubling of information that sounds odd.
However, I can't really follow the phrase properly without knowing what Alpha is. I imagine there could be some things which could be desc
00
I agree with Nona. Additionally, why not try?
. . . repeatedly generating sustainable Alpha in the emerging markets.
. . . repeatedly generating sustainable Alpha in the emerging markets.
0
Related Questions