0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar
Is this correct crom the grammar standpoint?
Hi!
Is this understandable from the grammar standpoint?
Considering the aforementioned, the court recognizes that Germany does not have jurisdiction in the claim and did not have also on the date of bringing the claim; instead, the dispute concerning custody of and access rights with the minor, XXX XXX, must be settled in the court of Austria.
Thank you!
Is this understandable from the grammar standpoint?
Considering the aforementioned, the court recognizes that Germany does not have jurisdiction in the claim and did not have also on the date of bringing the claim; instead, the dispute concerning custody of and access rights with the minor, XXX XXX, must be settled in the court of Austria.
Thank you!
Top answer
It's not good. I suggest eg Considering the aforementioned, the court recognizes that Germany does not have jurisdiction in the claim and did not have jurisdiction on the date of bringing the claim; instead, the dispute concerning custody of and access rights to the minor, *** ***, must be settled in the court of Austria.
- It's not good.
- I suggest eg Considering the aforementioned, the court recognizes that Germany does not have jurisdiction in the claim and did not have jurisdiction on the date of bringing the claim; instead, the dispute concerning custody of and access rights to the minor, *** ***, must be settled in the court of Austria.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
It's not good.
I suggest
eg Considering the aforementioned, the court recognizes that Germany does not have jurisdiction in the claim and did not have jurisdiction on the date of bringing the claim; instead, t
I suggest
eg Considering the aforementioned, the court recognizes that Germany does not have jurisdiction in the claim and did not have jurisdiction on the date of bringing the claim; instead, t
0
Related Questions