AlexandreAnother He says two axes and three axes instead of graph with 2 axes and graph with 3 axes. True, but I don't think that that is sufficient to say that the sentence contains metonymy. It's not as if either the graphs or the axes represent anything but the graphs and axes.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AlexandreAnotherHe says two axes and three axes instead of graph with 2 axes and graph with 3 axes.True, but I don't think that that is sufficient to say that the sentence contains metonymy. It's not as if either the graphs or the axes represent anything but the graphs and axes.
AlexandreAnotherYeah, thank you. I wasn't sure so I asked it, but if it's not a metonymy what is it? I am wondering if there's any term for such a thing.I don't think there is a term. I believe that in the context of mathematics it is just assumed that axes, just by the common sense of the reader, would be taken to be the axes of a graph, so I don't think th