0
Afewminuteslate Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Is the word "for" misused here?

Other remedies included one coxcomb,
some goose fat mixed with some honey, the salted flesh of a rabid dog, some maggots
from the carcass of a rabid dog, etc.; and as many remedies existed for the
local application of 'preventers', or for mixing them in drinks or food.

I think "for" was intended to mean "for the purpose of"; however, instead of indicating its goals, "for" indicates how it should be used.
  

Top answer

I replied otherwise to your other post on this passage, but you may be right. Still, it is hard to judge from such a strange and fragmentary passage what is intended.

  • I replied otherwise to your other post on this passage, but you may be right.
  • Still, it is hard to judge from such a strange and fragmentary passage what is intended.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
I replied otherwise to your other post on this passage, but you may be right. Still, it is hard to judge from such a strange and fragmentary passage what is intended.
0
One widespread myth was that rabies was caused by a small 'worm' at the base
of the tongue. A contemporary poet of Ovid (1st century BC), Grattius Falistcus,
knew about the mythical origin of the sublingual 'lyssa' of rabid dogs that Pliny
popularized; they believed that extracting the worms completely cured the dog.
And as a preventive, this worm was also thought to possess magic
0
The goal of the curative method is to apply medicine locally or mix them in drinks or food. I think the sentence makes sense. He meant remedies as a method here, but earlier he meant them as medicine.

Does that make sense?

Related Questions