The + comparative phrases usually moves themselves to the beginning in their clauses as in:
a. The more you have, the more you want.
However, I learned that the inversion might not happen when they are subordinated.
So, I want to know whether this inversion must happen or it is just optional in the first place.
?b. You have the more, you want the more.
?c. You have the more, the more you want.
?d. The more you have, you want the more.
Do you think all b, c, d are grammatically correct and are freely interchangable in speech or writing? Please let me know. Thank you ![]()
Justin Park Do you think all b, c, d are grammatically correct No. They're all wrong. The correct formula is always "the more ...
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Justin ParkDo you think all b, c, d are grammatically correct
No. They're all wrong. The correct formula is always "the more ... the more ...". (Of course, "the more" might be expressed as "the better", "the slower", "the prettier", etc. in cases where the -er ending is used.)
Justin Park I learned that the inversion mi
[1] [The more you have], the more you want.
[2] You want more, [the more you have].
[1] is the fronted version, while [2] is the basic version. In both types, the bracketed subordinate clause has the comparative phrase in front position.
As I understand it, in the basic version it would be possible,
Justin Parka. The more you have, the more you want.
You do not understand that "you have" and "you want" are modifiers of "the more".
" You have the more" is completely different than "The more (stuff / things that) you have"
"You have the more." does not make sense. Here are two correct sentences:
You have more (stuff/things) t