0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Is that not a relative pronoun ?

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lid

lid : a ?cover on a ?container, that can be ?lifted up or ?removed:

Reading the definition above, I thought that "that" should be a demonstrative pronoun because a comma before a relative pronoun "that" is ungrammatical. But I also have an opinion that "that" above is like a relative pronoun (subjective case) which postmodifies a noun phrase (a cover on a container). Then the dictionary's definition is a misprint since a comma before a relative pronoun "that" should be deleted. Ultimately, I don't know whether "that" above is a relative pronoun or a demonstrative pronoun.
  

Top answer

I thinlk that 'that' does not work, with the comma, as a relative. Anonymous Then the dictionary's definition is a misprint since a comma before a relative pronoun "that" should be deleted. I agree.

  • I thinlk that 'that' does not work, with the comma, as a relative.
  • Anonymous Then the dictionary's definition is a misprint since a comma before a relative pronoun "that" should be deleted.
  • I agree.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
I thinlk that 'that' does not work, with the comma, as a relative.
AnonymousThen the dictionary's definition is a misprint since a comma before a relative pronoun "that" should be deleted.
I agree.
0
AnonymousI don't know whether "that" above is a relative pronoun or a demonstrative pronoun.
It's a relative pronoun, but the definition is not punctuated correctly. Write a complaint to Cambridge.

Related Questions