Is "that" here restrictive or non-restrictive?

0 01blockquote

01cite10Bamtori12cite12br
10He pulled up 11font10a12font10 satellite image 11font10that12font10 showed three of the nasty storms moving south.12br
12br
12blockquote

10Here, the "that" clause is a "restrict

0 Used as a relative pronoun, 01i00that02i00 is always restrictive. There is no 'non-restrictive' 01i00that02i00.02br
02br
00 CJ0-

0Then, isn't it more appropriate to use "the" instead of "a" in front of "satellite image"?0-

0 01blockquote

01cite10Bamtori12cite12br
10Then, isn't it more appropriate to use "the" instead of "a" in front of "satellite image"?12br
12br
12blockquote

10Not necessarily, Bamtori. The article "a" or "the" doesn't depend upon the relative pronoun "that" in this sentence.0-

0Hi,02br
02br
00Taking as it is that used as a relative pronoun, that is always restrictive but the sentence in contention does warrant "the" in front of "satellite image," 01b00can you give me couple of examples that warrant "thes" as results of having relative pronoun "that"?02b0-

0 The use of a clause beginning with "that" after a noun does not require "the" before that noun -- nor "a" -- nor any article. The use of the article is for reasons independent of the use of the "that" clause.02br
02br
00 You don't remember John? He's a man that I met last week.02br
00 You don't remember John? He's the man that I met last week.02br

restrictive