It is a direct quote. That is exactly what Fleming habitually said. If Flemming had said, "that was" , then the writer would be correct in saying "that was" .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AlpheccaStarsIt is a direct quote. That is exactly what Fleming habitually said.If Flemming had said, "that was", then the writer would be correct in saying "that was".I meant, why did Fleming say '...that's exactly what I did.', and not '...that was exactly what I did.'?
nsfs2Why ... '...that's...' ,and not '...that was...'The equality between "that" (revolutionizing medicine) and "what I did" is timeless, in essence a logical equality of one thing with another. Timeless equalities like this are usually expressed with the present tense. 'was' is not incorrect, however. It turns out that in expressing this sort of timeless
CalifJim nsfs2Why ... '...that's...' ,and not '...that was...'The equality between "that" (revolutionizing medicine) and "what I did" is timeless, in essence a logical equality of one thing with another. Timeless equalities like this are usually expressed with the present tense. 'was' is not incorrect, however. It turns out that in expressing this sort of timeless equalit