0
Nsfs2 Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Is or was?

Hi,

Many years after his discovery, Fleming would remark 'I certainly didn't plan to revolutionize all medicine by discovering the world's first antibiotic, or bacteria killer.But I suppose that's exactly what I did'.

Q:Why does the writer say,'...that's...' ,and not '...that was...' in the sentence?Is using 'was' incorrect?

Thanks.
  

Top answer

It is a direct quote. That is exactly what Fleming habitually said. If Flemming had said, "that was" , then the writer would be correct in saying "that was" .

  • It is a direct quote.
  • That is exactly what Fleming habitually said.
  • If Flemming had said, "that was" , then the writer would be correct in saying "that was" .
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
It is a direct quote. That is exactly what Fleming habitually said.

If Flemming had said, "that was", then the writer would be correct in saying "that was".
0
AlpheccaStarsIt is a direct quote. That is exactly what Fleming habitually said.If Flemming had said, "that was", then the writer would be correct in saying "that was".
I meant, why did Fleming say '...that's exactly what I did.', and not '...that was exactly what I did.'?

Thanks, AlpheccaStars.
0
That (subject) is (verb) what I did. (complement)

It is very common to use the present tense in this kind of sentence.
The action is past (I did), but the speaker is thinking of it in the present. (That is....)
He could think of it as an entirely past action and use "That was..."
0
nsfs2Why ... '...that's...' ,and not '...that was...'
The equality between "that" (revolutionizing medicine) and "what I did" is timeless, in essence a logical equality of one thing with another. Timeless equalities like this are usually expressed with the present tense. 'was' is not incorrect, however. It turns out that in expressing this sort of timeless
0
CalifJim nsfs2Why ... '...that's...' ,and not '...that was...'The equality between "that" (revolutionizing medicine) and "what I did" is timeless, in essence a logical equality of one thing with another. Timeless equalities like this are usually expressed with the present tense. 'was' is not incorrect, however. It turns out that in expressing this sort of timeless equalit

Related Questions