Hello, Rotter, It's a little weird, but 1. is about an action: "Mr (no dot after Mr) has just died". (he has just passed from life to death), whereas 2.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
PieanneNo, I wouldn't. The reason is that the "r" is the last letter of the whole word, so you don't need a dot.
"Mister" > Mr / "Doctor" > Dr / "Mistress" >Mrs
When the last letter of the abbreviation is the same as the last letter of the whole word, there's no dot; when it isn't the same, there's a dot (period, full stop).
PhilipPieanne
No, I wouldn't. The reason is that the "r" is the last letter of the whole word, so you don't need a dot.
"Mister" > Mr / "Doctor" > Dr / "Mistress" >Mrs
When the last letter of the abbreviation is the same as the last letter of the whole word, there's no dot; when it isn't the same, there's a dot (pe
RotterSo what is the difference.
You would use the present perfect to express a connection between the "act" of dying and the present, e.g. (from Google):
1. Veteran BBC broadcaster John Peel has died at the age of 65...
[It's breaking news.]
2. If someone close to you has died, you probably feel overwhelmed with grief...
[The