0
Lission Posted 18 years ago
Grammar
Is 'more' needed'?
Hi everybody
We should treat animals with (more) respect, especially if they are kept as pets. We should not take them for walks and give them food meant for dogs, and not leftovers.
Is 'more' needed? Are there any errors in the sentence?
Thanks in advance.
We should treat animals with (more) respect, especially if they are kept as pets. We should not take them for walks and give them food meant for dogs, and not leftovers.
Is 'more' needed? Are there any errors in the sentence?
Thanks in advance.
Top answer
More is not necessary for the grammar, but may be necessary for the meaning. We should treat animals with (more) respect, especially when they are kept as pets.
- More is not necessary for the grammar, but may be necessary for the meaning.
- We should treat animals with (more) respect, especially when they are kept as pets.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
.
More is not necessary for the grammar, but may be necessary for the meaning.
We should treat animals with (more) respect, especially when they are kept as pets.
.
More is not necessary for the grammar, but may be necessary for the meaning.
We should treat animals with (more) respect, especially when they are kept as pets.
.
0
Related Questions