Mr. Lincoln likens that bond of the Federal
Constitution, joining Free and Slave States together, to a house divided against itself, and says that it is contrary to the law of God, and cannot stand.
(Excerpted from https://examgroup.org/sat-reading/reading-comprehension/practice-test-1)
I have something to ask on the part "that it is
contrary to the law of God, and cannot stand".
As far as I know, when the subject is the same for two verbs, there shouldn't be a comma before the conjunction "and", but as you see, there is a comma between "the law of God" and "and cannot stand".
I think it's wrong to add a comma in there, but sometimes is it okay to add a comma if context is clear?
As you see, it's obvious "is" and "cannot stand" are all the verbs of "it", which is referring to "a house".
fire1 As far as I know, when the subject is the same for two verbs, there shouldn't be a comma before the conjunction "and" This is the "textbook" rule. , or sometimes for no particular reason.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fire1As far as I know, when the subject is the same for two verbs, there shouldn't be a comma before the conjunction "and"
This is the "textbook" rule. In reality this rule is widely ignored, even by competent writers, when writers feel that a comma will help flow, phrasing, emphasis, readability etc., or sometimes for no particular reason.
There are 33 excerpts at the link. I didn't want to go through all of them to find this one, but I looked at a couple, and one was from 1895. This "Lincoln" one seems to be at least that old. They used to use a lot more commas than we do now, many of which would be just plain wrong today.
fire1I think it's wrong to add a comma in there, but sometimes is it okay to a