Is it OK with these?

1b00 If you can compile it with success in SQL*Plus, please then try to compile the same one in Toad, could you? 02b02br
02br
01b00Peter is also our Area-4 report developer! Please include him in the list.02b02br
02br
01b00Please advise if you’re able to access our report portal or not (by the following link).02b02br
02br
00Should it be 'GDP' instead of 'the GDP' below, shouldn't it?02br
01b00In 2 years, China will be with GDP (of only mainland) of 4.5 trillion USD (the world’s 2nd economy). It’s the pride of every Chinese.02b02br
02br
01b00If something is wrong for this logic, maybe we sit together with May for a solution.02b02br
02br
01b00Under what criteria, will there be any values for BL_no for the EQ records, to which some BKG records referred?02b02br
02br
00Is it OK if we say 'continue talking' below?02br
01b00Can we continue to talk about this?02b02br
02br
01b00This includes the logic, on B/L side, to take the 1st port_code_from (a table field) as por, 02br
00and last port_code_to as delivery port, from bl_route_legs table. This script has been 02br
00tested for such logic and is proved OK!02b02br
02br
01b00To confirm that I've made and verified OK for the change below.02b02br
02br
01b00Also I'm saying that the actual delivery port will be shown in the report, i.e. if delivery port is null, then it's shown as null. But for comparison, if delivery port is nothing, POD will be taken instead. This is the way the report is showing the ports.02b02br
02br
01b00I've made check-out/check-in for the sources. 02b02br
02br
01b00To see that the sources I checked-in are not changed by others.02br
02b0-