" A person corrected the paragraph claiming simple past should be used instead of past participle(gotten). He was pretty confident in his claim. They both (got/gotten) seem possible to me although got would probably be more common.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Angry BlondEI've posted a couple things here and gotten glowing feedback." A person corrected the paragraph claiming simple past should be used instead of past participle(gotten). He was pretty confident in his claim.
They both (got/gotten) seem possible to me although got would probably be more common.
I've posted a couple of things here and
Angry BlondEHe was pretty confident in his claim.
He was wrong. However, for regular verbs, and some irregular verbs, there is no orthographic difference in the past and past participle forms.
Examine a verb where this is not true, like eat, ring or steal:
I ate lunch. (past)
I have eaten lunch. (present perfect)
Frank s
Angry BlondEI've posted a couple things here
Usage note: Many want "a couple of things" there. Some say "a couple things" is not non-standard, but the rest of us hear it as quite odd. It's kind of like coriander—if you use it, 20 percent of your guests will think your food tastes like rancid stinkbug sweat, so why use it?