0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Is It A Hole?

Hello,

"Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means comfort."

This sentence comes from the first page of The Hobbit. I have a few questions. My first question is, are there implied words which are omitted? Should the sentence read, "It was not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells, nor yet was it a dry, bare, sandy hole...?"

My second question is, would the string of words " not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells" be acting as a subject complement for "it?"

My third question is, is "filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells" a compound participle phrase?
  

Top answer

Anonymous My first question is, are there implied words which are omitted? Yes. " No, it is fine as it is.

  • Anonymous My first question is, are there implied words which are omitted?
  • Yes.
  • " No, it is fine as it is.
  • " Yes.
  • Anonymous My third question is, is "filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells" a compound participle phrase?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Anonymous My first question is, are there implied words which are omitted?
Yes.
AnonymousShould the sentence read, "It was not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells, nor yet was it a dry, bare, sandy hole...?"
No, it is fine as it is.
AnonymousMy second question is, w
0
Oh, goodness. I thought that I was logged in when I posted this.
Mister MicawberNo, it is fine as it is.
No, I was just wondering how the sentence would read if the implied words were included. So, did I properly include them?
Mister MicawberNo; there is only one participle, acting adjectivally in a non-finite clause.
Why w
0
BashyboyI was just wondering how the sentence would read if the implied words were included. So, did I properly include them?
There is no 'proper inclusion', since the sentence author never omitted anything; however, your paraphrase is a good sentence.
BashyboyWhy wouldn't it be a compound participle phrase? Doesn't the sentence "Having
0
Mister MicawberYes, but that is not what you asked about. Please look at your own question above: 'My third question is, is "filled with the ends of worms and oozy smells" a compound participle phrase?'
Sorry, I meant to use the sentence "Having routed the enemy and flattened the city, the victors pillaged what they could" contain a compound participle phrase"

Related Questions