I always try and give examples that are relevant. Can you think of anything more important in the world - war in Iraq (what war) Sars (means nothing) Nothing compares to the biggest story of the year -
David Beckham going to Spain.
So Maj, I take it you are a Real Madrid supporter then! (Hitch, if you know how to move a post can you put it into foo as I think this is quite ge
0 That would depend on the sentence. e.g. 02br 02br 00a) There IS a man and a woman in the room. 02br 00b) There ARE two people in the room, a man and a woman. 02br 02br 00It is obvious that there are TWO people in the room and both sentences mean the same. Why is it that one sentence uses the verb "IS"(which is singular) and the other "ARE"(pl
0 I'm a mere learner, but I think the problem you are raising would be hard to fix even for qualified teachers. 02br 02br 00Some of native speakers would say like "there are a man and a woman", but others would say "there is a man and a woman". It looks like there is no rule in the choice between "are" or "is", but one of my books says that some grammarians studied this ling
0 To paco2004 02br 02br 00A friend told me that the sentence, "There IS a man and a woman in the room.", is a actually a compound sentence made up of two sentences:- 02br 02br 00i) There is a man in the room. 02br 00ii) There is a woman in the room. 02br 02br 00Joining both above sentences, we get, "There is a man in the roo
0 Hi! 02br 02br 00I don't know if your eplanation is correct but I was taught that when you have a list (lamp, glasses, plates) you could use 'there is': 02br 00There is a lamp, two glasses and three plates on the table. 02br 02br 02br 00Otherwise, you have to follow the rule: 02br 00ther is + singular: there is a lamp on t