0
Moon7296 Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

interpretation

....
From thislist e get a glipse of the ide variety of possible uses of language, but before we survey these various uses, we must first distinguish between using language to do something and using language in doing something.

Q) What does "using language to do something and ... in doing something" mean? I don't know the difference between the two.
  

Top answer

Without some actual examples to illustrate, I find it quite hard to understand the point of the distinction. I suppose "using language to do something" implies that the use of language is the main means of achieving the end result, while "using language in doing something" would mean that the use of language is an incidental to the process? Does that fit with the context?

  • Without some actual examples to illustrate, I find it quite hard to understand the point of the distinction.
  • I suppose "using language to do something" implies that the use of language is the main means of achieving the end result, while "using language in doing something" would mean that the use of language is an incidental to the process?
  • Does that fit with the context?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Without some actual examples to illustrate, I find it quite hard to understand the point of the distinction. I suppose "using language to do something" implies that the use of language is the main means of achieving the end result, while "using language in doing something" would mean that the use of language is an incidental to the process? Does that fit with the context?

Related Questions