"off of" is a horrible abomination. There is never any reason to use it. "off" by itself is always sufficient.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GPY"off of" is a horrible abomination.That seems a little extreme considering how often it's used, at least in American English.
GPYThere is never any reason to use it.Even in this case? Just curious, because it sounds a little, well, "off" to me without "of".
CalifJimThe walling off of great texts, with the exception of those written in English, is not a good development for the literate public, for students, or for our educational system.I agree that this is fine, and "of" is essential here. This is an unusual kind of "trick answer", not the normal "off of" that I was referring to.