Hello! What is the name for the following type of construction, in which an -ing verb appears after a comma and seemingly in place of a subject?
Prado considered apples to be superior to bananas, arguing that red fruit were tastier than yellow fruit.
It doesn't seem proper to me, perhaps because the second clause lacks a subject. I'd prefer "...superior to bananas, and he argued that..."
Thanks for your help.
anonymous arguing that red fruit were tastier than yellow fruit. That is a non-finite (participial) clause. It modifies the subject of the main verb, Prado.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
anonymousarguing that red fruit were tastier than yellow fruit.
That is a non-finite (participial) clause. It modifies the subject of the main verb, Prado. Normally these modifiers are fronted:
Arguing that red fruit were tastier than yellow fruit, Prado considered apples to be superior to bananas.
Here is another example:
Susan