A : I went home to find her mother was out.
B : I went home to find a light on in my room.
I wonder whether A and B can mean 1 or 2 and 3 or 4 according to context.
1. I went home in order to find her mother was out. (purpose)
2. I went home and found that her mother was out. (result)
3. I went home in order to find a light on in my room. (purpose)
4. I went home and found a light on in my room. (result)
I think A and B can be meant for 1 and 3 if "purpose" is used as expressing "result" and meant for 2 and 4 if "to find" is used as expressing "result".
I'd like to ask you whether I'm right on this point.
And if I'm right, is there no difference in meaning between 2 and 5 and 4 and 6 even if "only" is added in A and B as below?
5. I went home only to find her mother was out.
6. I went home only to find a light on in my room.
fire1 1. I went home in order to find her mother was out. (purpose) This interpretation is hardly possible since "find (that) her mother was out" strongly suggests a chance or unplanned event.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fire11. I went home in order to find her mother was out. (purpose)
This interpretation is hardly possible since "find (that) her mother was out" strongly suggests a chance or unplanned event.
fire12. I went home and found that her mother was out. (result)
Yes.
"went to her home" seems a more likely fit
Basically, native speakers would never express meanings #1 and #3 in this way.
Furthermore, when you think about it, meanings #1 and #3 are rather odd. It's hard to think of a context in which you would have that purpose.
Clive