0
Anonymous Posted 5 years ago
Grammar

Infinitive or past

Why is past used in this extract when grammar books say that infinitive or gerund could be used after see,...etc.?

"The economic success of the 1960s and 1970s saw Arabian Gulf countries transformed into modern states.'

  

Top answer

etc.? ' You can think of it as the omission of 'being', the gerund ( -ing ) form. saw Arabian Gulf countries (being) transformed into modern states.

  • etc.?
  • ' You can think of it as the omission of 'being', the gerund ( -ing ) form.
  • saw Arabian Gulf countries (being) transformed into modern states.
  • Or even as the omission of the infinitive.
  • saw Arabian Gulf countries (be) transformed into modern states.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
anonymous

Why is past used in this extract when grammar books say that infinitive or gerund could be used after see,...etc.?

"The economic success of the 1960s and 1970s saw Arabian Gulf countries transformed into modern states.'

You can think of it as the omission of 'being', the gerund (-ing) form.

... saw Arabian Gulf c

0

"transformed" here is not (active) past tense, but is the past participle used in a passive sense. "transform" is one of those verbs that can work either way. The subject can "transform" into something (active), or it can "be transformed" into something (passive), with essentially similar meaning when the agent of the passive verb is unspecified.

(Cross-posted.)

Related Questions