How can this infinitive "be" be explained grammatically ?
TasmanTiger
Top answer
Earlier forms of English used the subjunctive far more than we do. g. ].
— Anonymous
Earlier forms of English used the subjunctive far more than we do.
g.
].
But a subjunctive should express some sort of hope or doubt and it is not easy to see why Coleridge uses 'be' here.
Is it because he is not speaking in general of all maidens, or was the subjunctive already fading in his day and he is slightly misusing it because he wants the rhyme?
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Earlier forms of English used the subjunctive far more than we do. Read Shakespeare and you will find it everywhere [e.g. Othello says 'I think my wife be honest...]. But a subjunctive should express some sort of hope or doubt and it is not easy to see why Coleridge uses 'be' here. Is it because he is not speaking in general of all maidens, or was the subjunctive already fading in his day and he i
It means as many maidens may be but that's too many words; it spoils the rhythm, so may be becomes simply be. The substitution is made for the sake of the meter.
____
Another explanation is that this was written long ago, when the subjunctive form be was more commonly used, and be is then regarded