I'm completely stumped on these 4 sentences. Could someone explain why (1) doesn't work, even though (2) functions perfectly fine despite their grammatical similarity?
And why, linguistically speaking, despite (3) and (4) also sharing the same grammatical structure, they have completely different meanings? (3) being 'I forgot to complete the act of running' vs (4) 'I stopped what I'm doing to run'
(1) I forgot running.
(2) I stopped running.
(3) I forgot to run.
(4) I stopped to run.
Dean Webber Could someone explain why (1) doesn't work, The English catenative verbs operate very differently from each other. There is no rule, no rhyme nor reason as to why one takes an infinitive and another takes a gerund. org/wiki/Appendix:English_catenative_verbs Dean Webber (1) I forgot running.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Dean WebberCould someone explain why (1) doesn't work,
The English catenative verbs operate very differently from each other. There is no rule, no rhyme nor reason as to why one takes an infinitive and another takes a gerund.
Here is a very good list of them and the patterns:
Dean WebberI'm completely stumped on these 4 sentences.
Join the club!
There is no logical explanation for much of language. Languages grow and change over time in such a way that the reasons why some expressions have their current meanings are lost in history, or if not lost, require some heavy lifting to discover.
Dean Webber