Anonymous Can you have an indirect object without a direct object being either stated or implied? I don't think so. I can't think of an example.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousCan you have an indirect object without a direct object being either stated or implied?I don't think so. I can't think of an example.
AnonymousAlso, in the sentence "I put the plate on the table" is on the table an indirect object?No, it's a prepositional phrase with the function of an adverb.
AnonymousI disagree with this interpretation. In both examples, i.e. He helped me with my homework and They provided us with enough supplies the pronouns 'me' and 'us' are direct objects while 'my homework' and 'enough supply' are indirect ones. In other words: I was the direct receiver of the help, hence the direct object 'me' and we were the direct objects of the provis
hrsaneiWhen transitive verbs take objects, the inanimate one is considered indirect and the animate one is regarded as direct one.No, inanimate things can be either indirect or direct objects. The same is true for animate things, although the more frequent pattern is that the animate thing is the indirect object.
AlpheccaStarsAnonymous[.He helped me with my homework.Me is the direct object - it receives (directly) the action of the verb. An indirect object can be rewritten as a prepositional phrase with to or for.You cannot write * he helped to me.you said that in the sentence "He provided us supplies" us is the indirect obj
hrsaneiyou said that in the sentence "He provided us supplies" us is the indirect object. This explanation is in apparant contradiction with what you said above. An indirect object can be rewritten as a prepositional phrase with to or for.You cannot write * he provided to us. so us is not an indirect object.It is perfectly OK to write:
Regards