0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Indirect & Direct objects

Need help with Direct & Indirect objects (if any in the sentence below):

These open spaces add variety to a city. Is the Direct object Variety & the Indirect object City?

Thanks for your help.
  

Top answer

Because add is not a verb of giving, showing, or communicating, the inanimate object of to so often seen with it is not generally considered an indirect object. variety is indeed the direct object, but to a city is an ordinary prepositional phrase that does not rise to the level of being an indirect object. I rode the train to Los Angeles is another example where the to -phrase does not count as an indirect object.

  • Because add is not a verb of giving, showing, or communicating, the inanimate object of to so often seen with it is not generally considered an indirect object.
  • variety is indeed the direct object, but to a city is an ordinary prepositional phrase that does not rise to the level of being an indirect object.
  • I rode the train to Los Angeles is another example where the to -phrase does not count as an indirect object.
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
Because add is not a verb of giving, showing, or communicating, the inanimate object of to so often seen with it is not generally considered an indirect object.

variety is indeed the direct object, but to a city is an ordinary prepositional phrase that does not rise to the level of being an indirect object.

I rode the train to Los Angeles is an
0
These open spaces add variety to a city.

"Variety" would be the direct object, because it is what is being added.

The indirect object would be "city," because it is to what/whom "variety" is being added to.

I hope that makes sense for you and explains the difference between direct and indirect objects is.

If that doesn't help, I'll post the dictionary definitio

Related Questions