0
Volcano1985 Posted 17 years ago
Grammar
Increasingly, people factors are recognized
Increasingly, people factors are recognized as a major determinant of organizational performance
and a key competitive differential.Psychologists, ___, may also advise senior managers on the
management of organizational climate.
A) since
B) therefore
C) nevertheless
D) although
E) in addition
Could you explain me why the key is E, why not B?
and a key competitive differential.Psychologists, ___, may also advise senior managers on the
management of organizational climate.
A) since
B) therefore
C) nevertheless
D) although
E) in addition
Could you explain me why the key is E, why not B?
Top answer
Hi, In my opinion, it's a lousy test question. It requires more knowledge of the subject than it does of grammar. It's full of quasi-technical HR terminology that borders on business jargon.
- Hi, In my opinion, it's a lousy test question.
- It requires more knowledge of the subject than it does of grammar.
- It's full of quasi-technical HR terminology that borders on business jargon.
- B sounds better to me than E, since psychologists have not been mentioned before and it is not clear 'in addition to what' .
- Best wishes, Clive
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
Hi,
In my opinion, it's a lousy test question. It requires more knowledge of the subject than it does of grammar. It's full of quasi-technical HR terminology that borders on business jargon.
B sounds better to me than E, since psychologists have not been mentioned before and it is not clear 'in addition to what'.
Best wishes, Clive
In my opinion, it's a lousy test question. It requires more knowledge of the subject than it does of grammar. It's full of quasi-technical HR terminology that borders on business jargon.
B sounds better to me than E, since psychologists have not been mentioned before and it is not clear 'in addition to what'.
Best wishes, Clive
00
Hi,
You'd use "therefore" to show that what goes before, is the reason for what comes after.
You'd use "in addition" to show that what comes after is simply another example similar to what went before.
You'd use "therefore" to show that what goes before, is the reason for what comes after.
You'd use "in addition" to show that what comes after is simply another example similar to what went before.
0
Related Questions