"The Olympic Games", whether explicit or implicit, is the reason for "at". The actors in question are not "at Seoul" or "at Los Angeles". They are "at the Olympics in Seoul" or "at the Olympics in Los Angeles".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
radovanThanks. Would I say in the same way for example:Last week I was at a conference at Cambridge. ??? (event - conference, activity - learning, giving a speech ... )Last week I was at a concert at Cambridge. ???? (event - concert, activity - listening)You could.
fivejedjonIf the conference was at the university, then 'at Cambridge' is possible.Ah, yes. I was thinking only "city of Cambridge".
CalifJimI recommend:I was at a conference in Cambridge.Isn´t "At the 1984 Olympics, held at Los Angeles" similar to "I was at a conference in Cambridge"? First I mention the event, t
radovanIsn´t "At the 1984 Olympics, held at Los Angeles" similar to "I was at a conference in Cambridge"?It's more similar to "I was at a conference at Cambridge".
radovanI would tend to say "At the 1984 Olympics, held in Los Angeles".So would I.
radovanI believe I could omit "held" and say "At the