Anonymous Are these sentences Okay? No, that structure is very awkward and little used. Here are natural examples: He has stayed healthy by jogging for 10 years with his dog following him.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousAre these sentences Okay?No, that structure is very awkward and little used. Here are natural examples:
AnonymousCould we say that those sentences are grammatically correct but akward and little used?I am not sure they be called 'correct', since they are so awkward.
AnonymousWould you check these sentences, too?The same applies to those three.
AnonymousAre those two also awkward?Those are much more natural examples, especially #2, in which the reason is quite a long prefatory clause. #1 would still be much better revised to read She may be late, so we should leave without her.
AnonymousYou said that the No.1 is awkward and No.2 is more natural.Could you tell me what makes No.1 awkward and No.2 more natural?Because I can't see any difference between the two.Because the 'reason' referred to ins #1 ('he left yesterday') is much shorter and simpler than the 'reason' in #2 ('for British people a garden is an extension of their home').
AnonymousI am very interested in "preposition+which+noun" structureIt is not a thing to be interested in; it is of little practical use, really—you will usually be wrong in applying it.
AnonymousCould any of these three(#1~3) be used as a relative clause like #4? would you make any examples of them?Not interested at all in