0
Liveinjapan Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

in what was..

Bawag bank, the country’s third largest financial institution, was cajoled into buying the piano maker in 2002 in what was described as a “culturally important investment with a patriotic touch."

Can underscored part be replaced by these two below?
in what was billed as a
in the name of

Thanks in advance
  

Top answer

No, they have different meanings. in what was billed as a = in what was advertised as in the name of = on behalf of.

  • No, they have different meanings.
  • in what was billed as a = in what was advertised as in the name of = on behalf of.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
.
No, they have different meanings.

in what was billed as a = in what was advertised as

in the name of = on behalf of.
0
Got it! Thanks, Mister.
Another questions:
Who described the thing?
Who cajoled the bank?
Are they the same person or institution?
0
.
I don't know who did either, but they are not necessarily the same entity.
0
Got it! Thanks, Mister.
0
I think 'cajoled buying' is a negative meaning and 'culturally important investment with a patriotic touch' is a positive meaning.

So, the sentence indicates:
The bank was cajoled into buying the pianomaker, but the fact of being cajoled didn't have much impact to the public because the situsation was described as a 'culturally important investment' at the time.

Right?

Related Questions